NoBroker battles COVID-19 to become India’s first property-tech Unicorn

NoBroker raised $210 million, last week, raising its valuation from $350 million (in April 2020) to $1 billion, becoming India’s first prop-tech unicorn.

30th November 2021
3 min read

Read the entire article to get 100 buildd points Sign in to gain points

Tag wise split:

    Stage 100

  • Idea Validation 20
  • Growth 30
  • Mature 50

  • Topic 100

  • Product 50
  • Funding 50

  • Content Type 100

  • Startup Analysis 50
  • Staying Updated 50

In a nutshell

NoBroker began in a crowded yet large industry, to build a tech-based, brokerage-free real estate platform.

Like its competitors, finding profitability has been tough - while it has tripled its revenue each year, even in FY20 its losses were almost 3 times its revenue!

Yet, the company raised $210 million, last week, raising its valuation from $350 million (in April 2020) to $1 billion, becoming India’s first prop-tech unicorn.

VCs have still shown interest, likely due to the general positive funding climate, but also because of NoBroker's foray into gated society software, NoBrokerHood, that shows potential for various business models to be laid on top of it.

The plans to aggressively expand into 50 cities and to build its software platform are interesting moves, but this remains a tough & competitive space. So, only time will unfold its future outcome :)


The latest addition to the list of 30+ Indian startups to get the unicorn status this year is NoBroker. At this point you may just be reading this and be saying "Oh, great, another one". But, a unicorn in the tough Real Estate industry? That's new.

With the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, the real estate sector was one of the worst-hit. Becoming India's first proptech (property + tech) unicorn during such a challenging time is definitely something that deserves attention.

So, my attention it has. I started researching around it and condensed it in this quick 2-min read. Let's go!

Was there a need for a firm like NoBroker?

Well, house hunting is a pain. That's not new. But, even before NoBroker existed, we had companies that made buying or renting places online possible, such as MagicBricks, QuikrHomes, etc.

Now, NoBroker noticed that such platforms were often just marketing platforms for brokers i.e. the listings weren't made by owners. So, why not eliminate the middlemen?

That was NoBroker's plan - a tech based, brokerage-free, real estate platform.

There are a couple of things to learn here for entrepreneurs:

  1. Presence of competitors doesn't mean a successful startup can't be built in the space.
  2. Extending the above point - in a big industry, there can be many winners.

Hmm, so how's its business performing?

Even with competition, NoBroker has been able to steadily triple its revenue each year. It claims to have 15 million+ registered users across six cities and clearly that is only going to grow further.

That sounds quite positive. The NOT so good catch is that the company spent almost 3 rupees to earn each rupee of operating revenue in FY20 i.e. its expenditure was over INR 179 crore, while the revenue was INR 63 crore.

So, yup, we have another Unicorn that is burning cash to find growth. Also, this is not a recent symptom for NoBroker - it's been the case from inception.

To put it in context though, the entire industry has been having a tough time - competitors such as MagicBricks and 99Acres that have been around for far longer have only reported slim profits.

Then why are VCs so interested in it?

Just last week the company raised a whopping $210 million (~INR 1600 crores) that took its valuation from $350 million (in April 2020) to $1 billion. With this, it has become India's first prop-tech unicorn.

But, why would VCs put that kind of money in a company placed in a tough industry AND one that's burning a ton of money? Hmm, not an easy answer, but some points are:

  1. While markets are poor globally, the investments in the Indian proptech sector grew in 2020, albeit marginally from $549 million to $551 million.
  2. It definitely helps that property is considered an important asset to invest in - not for a quick buck but in the long-term.
  3. NoBroker has diversified into providing software, called NoBrokerHood for gated societies - currently at 10,000.
    • Now, this platform allows for it to lay various different business models on top of it - home loans, packers & movers, legal, etc.
    • It is already allowing 3rd party brands to sell to residents through this platform.
  4. I say this grudgingly, but to an extent, the generally positive funding climate seems to have helped the deal :)

What happens in the "long run"?

The real estate is brutal and a crowded space. NoBroker has to battle with over 10 big competitors, many who have been in the industry for way longer, with some even reporting profits.

However, this is an industry where quick inroads is tough. So, the company that is able to execute well in the long-run will see the maximum gains.

This money does help NoBroker to expand aggressively - it plans to expand to an additional 50 cities. However, it also understands the challenge of staying tied to the "traditional" proptech model.

So, there is surely going to be a lot of money poured into the NoBrokerHood software platform. While that's a really interesting play, whether it works is something we will have to wait & see :)

Comments

You'll love these articles too!

India's biggest IPO Uncovered - PayTM
India's biggest IPO Uncovered - PayTM
Why is India obsessed with 10-minute delivery startups?
Why is India obsessed with 10-minute delivery startups?
Elon Musk buys 9.2% of Twitter stake for free speech!?
Elon Musk buys 9.2% of Twitter stake for free speech!?

India's biggest IPO Uncovered - PayTM

PayTM is raising 18,300 crores at >INR 1 lakh crore valuation ⇒ Biggest ever IPO in India

Existing investors are selling shares to the tune of ~10,000 crores

PayTM is still loss-making and has been able to list in India due to SEBI allowing such companies to list in India

While it has shown strong top-line growth, it is in a highly competitive space which also faces uncertainties from regulators.

Why is India obsessed with 10-minute delivery startups?

All big brands fighting to get a piece of the quick commerce pie.
- Zepto raised $100M in 45 days after raising $60M
- Swiggy put $700M into Instamart
- Reliance put $220M into Dunzo
- BlinkIt raised $100M from Zomato in 2021

So, the baseline for grocery delivery time has been revised to 10 minutes now. Similarly, you also have to offer free delivery & discounts if you have to stay in the race.

Competition is making these startups do things they otherwise possibly won't. Look at Zomato. The company was already competing with Swiggy in the food delivery space but now it's going head-on to challenge Swiggy's 10-min delivery startup Instamart.

Zomato is going all-in to bail out a bleeding company — BlinkIt, in a $700M deal to get its own 10-min grocery delivery startup.
But, what are these startups trying to achieve?

Well, the biggest argument for quick grocery delivery is that it will bring in a long-term behavourial change in consumers, which can hopefully never be reversed. So, the bet is, once you are used to having groceries delivered in 10-min, you can't go back to the old ways.

But, what's wrong with this assumption?
- Well, in day-to-day life it rarely happens that you need grocery items to be delivered right away.
- Plus making money heavily depends on having a higher-order value which is not the case with these startups.

Now, even if these startups overcome both these problems, yet the fear of losing customers to competitors still remains.

Overall, it's surely an uphill battle for quick delivery startups to survive and eventually make money.
For now, though, enjoy the luxury of getting your groceries delivered at the blink of an eye 😉

Elon Musk buys 9.2% of Twitter stake for free speech!?

On March 25th, Elon Musk polled his 80M followers asking them if they "believe Twitter rigorously adheres to the principle of free speech".

The results were resoundingly clear — 70% of the over 2M votes said "No".

The next day, Musk followed this up with another tweet almost hinting that he might consider buildd-ing a new Twitter-like platform. But, the entire narrative quickly took a 180!

In a span of just 10-days, Musk went from criticizing Twitter to becoming its largest shareholder. Naturally, this raised a lot of eyebrows, with some suggesting that the poll was likely a gimmick to drive down Twitter share values so Musk can get a better deal.

But, here's an important fact — Musk had actually bought these shares back on 14th March.

So, either he thinks Twitter makes for a good investment or he has big plans for the company. Now, we know Musk is not an "investor" type billionaire, so option one doesn't entirely makes sense.

As, for the option 2, Musk only owns a passive Twitter stake, which means he has no control over running the company. But, many analysts speculate that this might change very quickly.

Now, yesterday, Parag Agarwal announced that Elon Musk is appointed on Twitter's board so all the theories about what might change will possibly come true. But, only time will tell how things pan out!